[Aug 24, 2026] CFE-Law Practice Exam Dumps - 99% Marks In ACFE Exam
Updated Verified CFE-Law Q&As - Pass Guarantee or Full Refund
To be eligible for the CFE-Law certification exam, candidates need to meet certain requirements. They should have a degree in law or a related field, and should have at least one year of experience in fraud examination. Candidates should also be a member of the ACFE, and should have completed the ACFE's fraud examination training program.
ACFE CFE-Law (Certified Fraud Examiner) certification exam is designed for professionals who specialize in detecting, preventing, and investigating fraud in the legal industry. Certified Fraud Examiner certification is recognized globally and demonstrates a strong understanding of the principles and practices necessary to combat fraud. The CFE-Law designation is a highly respected certification that is sought after by employers and clients alike.
NEW QUESTION # 95
Which of the following is NOT an element that must be proven to establish a penury offense?
- A. The defendant made the statement with knowledge of its falsity
- B. The defendant made a false statement that was material
- C. The defendant made a false statement white under oath.
- D. The defendant made a false statement in a court of law.
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 96
Felix is charged with violating a criminal law that prohibits making false statements to government agencies.
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the elements the government must prove to establish a violation?
- A. The government must prove that the defendant knew the statement was false.
- B. The government must prove that the statement concerned a matter within the jurisdiction of a government agency.
- C. The government must prove that the statement was material.
- D. The government must prove that it suffered a loss for relying on the false statement.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The correct answer is C because a false-statements offense generally does not require the government to prove that it suffered a financial loss by relying on the statement. Under 18 U.S.C. 1001, the key elements include that the statement concerned a matter within the jurisdiction of a government agency, that it was knowingly false, and that it was material. The Department of Justice and the statutory text both identify jurisdiction, knowledge, and materiality as core elements.
That means options A, B, and D all describe recognized elements of the offense. By contrast, actual loss to the government is not required. A defendant can violate the statute even if the agency detects the lie immediately and never changes its position or loses money. The law is designed to protect the integrity of governmental functions and decision-making, not merely to punish lies that cause measurable financial harm. So long as the false statement is material and knowingly made in a matter within agency jurisdiction, the offense can be established. Therefore, the statement saying the government must prove that it "suffered a loss for relying on the false statement" is the incorrect one, making C the right answer. (Department of Justice)
NEW QUESTION # 97
The MOST COMMON bankruptcy fraud scheme is:
- A. A planned bustcut
- B. Forged filing
- C. A credit card bustout
- D. Concealment of assets
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 98
Which of the following is generally NOT one of the goals of deferred prosecution agreements?
- A. To get an organization to reform its policies
- B. To reduce the risk of illegal practices at an organization
- C. To postpone prosecution until a company conducts an extensive internal investigation
- D. To allow prosecutors to resolve a case while still punishing malfeasance
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 8.
In the context of Criminal Prosecutions, specifically relating to deferred prosecution, the question asks about NOT.
The correct answer is A: To postpone prosecution until a company conducts an extensive internal investigation.
This question addresses criminal prosecution concepts. The correct answer correctly identifies aspects of criminal proceedings, burdens of proof, or sentencing options. Understanding the criminal justice process is essential for fraud examiners working with law enforcement.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 8: Criminal Prosecutions
- deferred prosecution
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
NEW QUESTION # 99
Greg is serving as an expert witness and is being cross-examined at trial. The questioning party gets Greg to state that he spent considerable time working on a certain issue in the case. Then the questioning party asks many questions on a tangential issue in the case that Greg knows little about. Which of the following describes the questioning party's method?
- A. Bias
- B. Sounding board
- C. Myopic vision
- D. Personal attack
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 9.
In the context of Civil Actions, specifically relating to trial, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.
The correct answer is A: Myopic vision.
This question focuses on civil action processes. The correct answer accurately describes civil litigation procedures, evidence preservation, or remedies available to fraud victims. Civil recovery is often an important component of fraud resolution. Expert witnesses provide specialized knowledge to help the fact finder understand complex issues. Their testimony must be relevant, reliable, and based on sufficient facts or data.
NEW QUESTION # 100
Which of the following statements regarding civil lawsuits in most jurisdictions is CORRECT?
- A. Civil lawsuits begin with the filing of a pleading, usually in the jurisdiction in which the defendant resides or where the claim arose
- B. All of the above are correct
- C. The plaintiffs initial filing does not typically need to contain a summary of the evidence
- D. The plaintiff's initial filing with the court does not typically need to include the specific facts on which the claim relies.
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to civil, the question asks about civil lawsuits in most jurisdictions is CORRECT, CORRECT.
The correct answer is B: Civil lawsuits begin with the filing of a pleading, usually in the jurisdiction in which the defendant resides or where the claim arose.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
NEW QUESTION # 101
Which of the following statements concerning civil trials in common law jurisdictions is MOST ACCURATE?
- A. Jury verdicts m civil trials must always be unanimous
- B. Neither side may appeal an adverse judgment in a civil case
- C. in most civil cases, the standard of proof is the preponderance of the evidence
- D. Civil jury trials must have the same number of jurors as in criminal jury trials.
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, civil, common law, the question asks about MOST ACCURATE, civil trials in common law jurisdictions is MOST ACCURATE.
The correct answer is C: Jury verdicts m civil trials must always be unanimous.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
NEW QUESTION # 102
Which of the following is NOT one of the elements that the government must prove to establish a violation of a law criminalizing false statements to government agencies?
- A. The government relied on the false statement
- B. The defendant made a false statement
- C. The false statement was material
- D. The defendant knew the statement was false
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 103
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations advise countries to do all of the following EXCEPT:
- A. Use a risk-based approach when setting anti-money laundering policies
- B. Require financial institutions to monitor their customers' political affiliations.
- C. Require financial institutions to keep certain records and establish anti-money laundering policies.
- D. Enable authorities to trace freeze, and confiscate assets suspected in money laundering and terrorist financing
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 104
Which of the following statements concerning front businesses as a method of laundering money is the LEAST ACCURATE?
- A. From criminals' perspective a disadvantage to front businesses is that they generally must pay taxes on the illicit income
- B. A red flag of a front business is the observation of a large number of customers during peak operating hours
- C. Front businesses benefit launderers by providing a safe place to manage criminal activities
- D. Front businesses provide cover for delivery and transportation related to illegal activity
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to criminal, the question asks about LEAST ACCURATE, front businesses as a method of laundering money is the LEAST ACCURATE.
The correct answer is A: A red flag of a front business is the observation of a large number of customers during peak operating hours.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
NEW QUESTION # 105
Grant, a fraud examiner is investigating Beatrice for embezzlement on his employer's behalf. During his investigation. Grant learns that Beatrice has cheated on her spouse and he tells several of Beatrice's coworkers about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant. Which of the following is the BEST explanation of why Beatrice will not win her defamation case?
- A. The statement was not printed and distributed
- B. The communications to the subject's coworkers were privileged
- C. The news was not communicated to enough people
- D. The information was true
Answer: D
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 10.
In the context of Basic Principles of Evidence, specifically relating to privilege, the question asks about it Beatrice discovers that Grant revealed the unflattering (albeit true) information about her and decides to file a claim of defamation against Grant, BEST.
The correct answer is A: The information was true.
This question tests knowledge of evidence principles. The correct answer correctly distinguishes between types of evidence, admissibility requirements, or evidentiary privileges. Proper handling of evidence is crucial for successful fraud investigations and prosecutions.
NEW QUESTION # 106
Which of the following statements concerning examinations of expert witnesses in most inquisitorial jurisdictions is accurate?
- A. The parties are often allowed to question the expert's methods and analysis
- B. The parties determine the extent of consideration to be given to the expert's testimony
- C. The expert has the discretion to determine the scope of the examinations
- D. The judge is not allowed to question the expert's credibility under any circumstance
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 107
Raj is an employee who works in a jurisdiction that prohibits unreasonable workplace searches and surveillance in areas or items where employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy. In which of the following is Raj MOST LIKELY to have a reasonable expectation of privacy?
- A. A waste bin m the employee's office
- B. A filing cabinet in the office lobby
- C. A backpack brought from home
- D. A company-issued tablet computer
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 7.
In the context of Individual Rights During Examinations, specifically relating to employee, privacy, surveillance, workplace, the question asks about MOST LIKELY.
The correct answer is A: A backpack brought from home.
This question relates to individual rights during examinations. The correct answer accurately describes the legal protections, obligations, or privacy considerations that apply in workplace investigations. Fraud examiners must balance investigative needs with legal protections for individuals.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 7: Individual Rights During Examinations
- employee
- privacy
- surveillance
- workplace
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
NEW QUESTION # 108
Which of the following would be circumstantial evidence that a cashier at a retail store committed a cash larceny scheme that resulted in the theft of $900 from the store?
- A. A coworker explains the ethics policy that the retail store's employees must follow.
- B. A witness testifies that they saw the cashier take money out of a cash register on the day that the theft occurred.
- C. A witness testifies that the cashier made a $900 deposit to their personal bank account the day after the theft occurred.
- D. A diagram is used to display the location of the retail store's cash registers.
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct answer is C because it is the best example of circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence does not directly prove the ultimate fact in dispute. Instead, it establishes surrounding facts from which a judge or jury may reasonably infer the conclusion. Here, proof that the cashier deposited $900 into a personal bank account the day after $900 was stolen does not directly show the cashier taking the money, but it strongly suggests involvement in the theft. That is precisely how circumstantial evidence works in fraud and theft cases.
Option A is direct evidence, not circumstantial evidence, because an eyewitness claims to have actually seen the cashier remove money from the register. Option B is merely demonstrative or illustrative evidence showing store layout; by itself, it does not tend to prove that the cashier committed the theft. Option D also does not prove the act of theft; it only explains a workplace rule or standard. In fraud examinations, circumstantial evidence is often very important because many fraudulent acts occur in secret, requiring investigators to prove wrongdoing through patterns, financial links, timing, and conduct rather than direct observation alone. Therefore, C is the strongest circumstantial-evidence choice.
NEW QUESTION # 109
Which of the following would be direct evidence that an employee committed a cash larceny scheme that resulted in the theft of $800 from their employer's safe?
- A. A witness testifies that the employee was usually the last person to leave the office.
- B. A coworker states that the employee appeared to be nervous on the day of the theft.
- C. A witness testifies that they saw the employee take the money.
- D. A diagram is used to display the location of the employer's safe.
Answer: C
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 7.
In the context of Individual Rights During Examinations, specifically relating to employee, the question asks about the core concepts in this area.
The correct answer is C: A witness testifies that they saw the employee take the money..
This question relates to individual rights during examinations. The correct answer accurately describes the legal protections, obligations, or privacy considerations that apply in workplace investigations. Fraud examiners must balance investigative needs with legal protections for individuals.
NEW QUESTION # 110
Which of the following scenarios is an example of the criminal sanction known as criminal forfeiture?
- A. As part of his sentence for tax evasion, a Defendant is ordered to pay a fine of $10,000 to the government
- B. As part of her sentence for money laundering a defendant is sentenced to a three- to five-year term of incarceration
- C. As part of his sentence for embezzlement, a defendant is ordered to pay back his employer for the money he stole.
- D. As part of her sentence for bribery a defendant is ordered to transfer a car she received as a bribe to the government
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 111
In a particular country's judicial process, the judge oversees the investigation of a case is primarily responsible for questioning witnesses and generally plays a larger role in the evidence-gathering process than the parties' legal counsel Which of the following BEST describes this type of judicial process'?
- A. Adversarial process
- B. Common law process
- C. Inquisitorial process
- D. Substantive law process
Answer: A
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 1.
In the context of Overview of the Legal System, specifically relating to common law, adversarial, inquisitorial, the question asks about BEST.
The correct answer is A: Adversarial process.
This question relates to the legal system framework. Understanding the distinction between different legal systems and processes is crucial for fraud examiners. The correct answer accurately describes the relationship between different legal entities and their jurisdictions.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 1: Overview of the Legal System
- common law
- adversarial
- inquisitorial
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
NEW QUESTION # 112
Allison works for a government contractor She informs the government that her employer has been submitting false claims to the government for payment Later it is discovered that Allison has misappropriated more than $50,000 of her employer's money Alison qualifies as a whistleblower entitled to anti-retaliation protection under the law because of her report to the government Which of the following statements about Allison is CORRECT?
- A. None of the above
- B. Alison cannot be fired for informing the government of her employee's fraud
- C. Allison cannot be fired for any reason
- D. Allison cannot be fired for misappropriating funds from her employer
Answer: B
Explanation:
This question tests your knowledge of Domain 7.
In the context of Individual Rights During Examinations, specifically relating to employee, whistleblower, the question asks about Allison is CORRECT, CORRECT.
The correct answer is C: Alison cannot be fired for informing the government of her employee's fraud.
This question relates to individual rights during examinations. The correct answer accurately describes the legal protections, obligations, or privacy considerations that apply in workplace investigations. Fraud examiners must balance investigative needs with legal protections for individuals.
References:
- CFE Exam Content Outline: Domain 7: Individual Rights During Examinations
- employee
- whistleblower
- Fraud Examiners Manual, Law Section
NEW QUESTION # 113
......
CFE-Law Real Valid Brain Dumps With 220 Questions: https://www.realvalidexam.com/CFE-Law-real-exam-dumps.html
CFE-Law Certification with Actual Questions: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bwKxtEvpAC9rlzoPfl_7nbSwrczC9xtm
